显示标签为“Base-12 MTP”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Base-12 MTP”的博文。显示所有博文

2017年4月17日星期一

MTP Base-8 and Base-12: Correct Using Principles

In my previous post “MTP Links: Base-8 vs. Base-12 vs. Base-24”, I have done a comparison among Base-8 MTP, Base-12 MTP and Base-24 MTP. And from the post, we can conclude that Base-8 MTP link is the most future-proof option for the quickly-changing network requirements. But someone may ask “I have deployed Base-12 or Base-24 MTP link. Can I still deploy Base-8 MTP connectivity in the network? Or will Base-8 connectivity fit all applications?”. This post will answer these questions. Keep reading, you’ll get more.

Can Base-8 and Base-12 Be Used Together: Yes Or No?
 
The answer of this question depends. If directly mix the components and plug a Base-8 MTP cable into a 12-fiber module, then the answer is “No”. Base-8 components and Base-12 components are not designed to be plugged directly into each other. Generally, Base-12 MTP trunk cables have unpinned (female) MTP connectors on both ends, and require the use of pinned (male) breakout modules. But the Base-8 MTP trunk cables are manufactured with pinned connectors on both ends. So plugging a Base-8 trunk cable into a Base-12 breakout module will definitely not work. However, Base-8 and Base-12 MTP connectivity can be used in the same data center, but they should be maintained independently. As they are not interchangeable, some care is needed when managing the data center physical layer infrastructure, to ensure Base-8 and Base-12 components are not mixed within the same link.

MTP link working principle: yes or no 

Will One Type Fit All?
 
As known to all, 12-fiber MPO connectors are common in data centers, but they pose a problem when installed in a parallel path system—four unused fibers remain per connection. Typically, Base-8 can be a more cost-effective option for end-to-end MPO to MPO channels and architectures. Deploying Base-8 connectivity in duplex architectures for 10GBASE-SR and 25GBASE-SR will save 4% to 5% for data center managers, but if you’re running groups of 6-ports, Base-8 may result in a significant cost increase. Generally speaking, not one size fits all. Base-8 connectivity isn’t a universal solution. In fact, in some cases, Base-12 may still be more cost-effective. So it’s best to have both Base-8 and Base-12 connectivity in the same data center through careful management and labeling practices.

Summary
 
From what have described above, we can get these points. Although Base-8 and Base-12 MTP connectivity are not interchangeable, but they can be used in the same data center as long as the links are maintained separately. Base-8 and Base-12 MTP fiber links cannot be mixed and matched. Moreover, there is no one connectivity method fitting for all network applications. Base-8 connectivity method and Base-12 connectivity method can be used in different applications that can make the most of each type. For the most commonly 10G to 40G migration, Base-8 connectivity would be a strong consideration over Base-12.

 
Other post you may be interested: MTP-8 Solution: Future-Proof Connectivity in Data Center

2017年4月5日星期三

MTP Links: Base-8 vs. Base-12 vs. Base-24

For data center managers, deploying a fiber system that can easily be upgraded to future high-density network demands is the first thing that should be considered, because network reconfiguration would result in lots of time and money. So it is essential to deploy a fiber network which is easier to upgrade to the higher data rates from the start. For high density MTP links, Base-8 vs. Base-12 vs. Base-24: which one can provide a easier migration path for future network data rates?

Base-8 MTP Link
 
Base-8 MTP link is based on Type B male/pinned MTP trunk in the backbone. Base-8 MTP is SR4 ready, meaning that the backbone connectivity has the same fiber count as the SR4 transceiver. Base-8 MTP links allow customers to patch directly to SR4 transceivers without having to convert connectors with different fiber counts or waste excess fibers in the backbone. As SR4 transceivers are the preferred choices for 40G, 100G data rates and beyond, the Base-8 system is arguably the most scalable and future-proof backbone choice currently available. Customers deploying 10G data rates today can still deploy the Base-8 system knowing that upgrades to 40G or 100G will be much simpler and cost effective in the future. The following picture is 1x3 MTP conversion harness cables used in 40G/100G network with 100% fiber utilization.

1x3 MTP conversion harness cable with 100% fiber utilization 

Base-12 MTP Link
 
Base-12 MTP link is based on Type A female/unpinned MTP trunk in the backbone. Base-12 MTP is partially SR4 ready, because although SR4 is an 8 fiber interface, the Base-12 MTP connector is still compatible with it. Unlike the Base-8 MTP system, Base-12 does not utilize all of the fibers in the backbone when patched directly with SR4 transceivers, however multiple Base-12 MTP connectors can be combined and then converted so that full fiber utilization can still be achieved. Take our 2x3 MTP conversion harness cables for example, these MTP conversion cables have two 12-fiber MTP connectors on one end and three 8-fiber MTP connectors on the other end, which utilize all 12 fibers in two trunks for use with three port channels.

2x3 MTP conversion harness cables with 100% fiber utilization 

Base-24 MTP Link
 
Base-24 MTP link is generally deployed for 100G parallel links running over SR10 transceivers. Normally these links are between two high data-rate switches as opposed to switch to server. Base-24 can also be used for lower data rate backbone links such as 10G and 40G but this is normally only in cases where space and install time are the key drivers.

MTP Links: Base-8 vs. Base-12 vs. Base-24
  • Initial Investment
Base-8 does require a higher up-front investment than Base-12 or Base-24 backbones due to the higher number of MTP connectors that are installed from day 1. However, research shows that the rapid increase in data rates will bring a return on investment within a few years. Furthermore, Base-8 provides the most efficient link constructions for SR4 meaning that the investment to convert Base-12 or Base-24 to SR4 will be largely if not completely avoided later.
  • Fiber Utilization
Although Base-12 backbones are still the most common choice for most data center operators today, it should be noted that there are still no standardized transceivers using all 12 fibers in a Base-12 connector. Furthermore, the most likely transceiver interface SR4 in the future uses only 8 fibers. With this in mind, customers need to make the important decision whether to deploy Base-12 today and risk wasting 33% of backbone fibers tomorrow, or go straight for Base-8 knowing that it will be the best investment for the future.
  • No. of Cables
Compared to Base-8 or Base-12, Base-24 reduces the number of cables required in the link, and sometimes this can be a compelling driver towards using this particular interface in the backbone. However, it should be noted that deploying Base-24 as a backbone choice will require MTP transition modules or MTP conversion harness to make it suitable for 10G and 40G data rates.

Summary
 
From what have described above, we can see that Base-8 MTP link, Base-12 MTP link and Base-24 MTP link have their own cons and prons. Base-8 MTP trunks allow users to build 10G links today but can easily be upgraded to 40G links tomorrow using 8 fiber MTP connectivity. Base-12 and Base-24 MTP trunks allow users to build 10G links today, which can easily be upgraded to 40G/100G links tomorrow using MTP conversion modules, MTP conversion harness or jumpers, but would result in 33% fiber wastage. MTP Links: Base-8 vs. Base-12 vs. Base-24: which is your choice?


 
12-Fiber or 24-Fiber MTP/MPO Cabling: Which Is Better for 40G/100G Network?